What the Bible Really Says About Multiple Wives

Published on  March 7, 2026/6 Comments

Addressing a Growing Epidemic of Polygyny in Torah Communities

June

By June

Author’s Note

This article has been in the making for a year — born from a topic Sister Joyful Song and I desire to discuss openly on the Kingdom Relationships podcast we co-host together. And each time I get pinged about another sister whose husband has expressed interest in bringing in another wife, it reminds me of just how critical it is to get this information out there.

So the goal here is twofold: to make people aware of a growing epidemic, and to empower women and men alike to know what Scripture actually says on this topic. It draws from a variety of sources — all cited at the end — but primarily from Abba’s Word. Some of what follows will be direct. Some will be gentle. All of it is grounded in love and Scripture (Ephesians 4:15; Galatians 6:1).

A woman stands at the stove stirring a pot, a thought bubble above her head reading 'Is this biblical? Second wife? Do I get a say? What about our covenant?' — while her husband sits at the table scrolling his phone.
A woman stands at the stove stirring a pot, a thought bubble above her head reading 'Is this biblical? Second wife? Do I get a say? What about our covenant?' — while her husband sits at the table scrolling his phone.

The words hung in the air between us like smoke—quiet, suffocating, and impossible to pretend I hadn’t inhaled.

“I’ve been praying about something,” he said casually, still scrolling through his phone.

“There’s a sister in the assembly. She needs covering. And I believe Yahuah is calling her to be my wife.”

I stared at him, unsure if I’d heard him correctly.

He finally looked up. “We’re going to need a bigger bed.”

I stood frozen in our kitchen, wooden spoon still in my hand, the pasta sauce bubbling unattended on the stove. Did he just say what I thought he said?

My husband—the man I’d pledged my life to, the man I’d built a home with, the man who’d stood before Yahuah and our community and vowed to be mine—was scrolling through his phone like he’d just commented on the weather. Like he hadn’t just shattered our entire covenant with seven casual words.

“For the second wife,” he added casually.

“Second wife?” The words formed on my lips, but nothing came out.

The words felt foreign in my mouth, like I’d swallowed broken glass. My palms started sweating. My chest tightened. A thousand questions crashed through my mind at once:

Is this even biblical? Why hasn’t he mentioned this before? Does he want an orgy? Why wouldn’t she have her own bed? Is he going to have children with this person? Do I get a say in this? Did I miss something in Scripture? Am I a bad wife? Is this why he’s been distant? How long has he been ‘praying’ about HER?

But what came out was barely a whisper: “What?”

He finally looked up from his phone, irritated that I wasn’t understanding something so obvious. “It’s Torah, babe. Abraham had multiple wives. Jacob had multiple wives. David had multiple wives. If you’d study Scripture instead of clinging to Western feminism—”

“Western feminism?” My voice cracked. “I just… we just got married. You and me. One flesh. That’s what you said. That’s what we vowed.”

He sighed—the kind of sigh you give a child who doesn’t understand math. “That was before Yahuah opened my eyes to His true design. Look, I’m not asking your permission. I’m telling you what Yahuah is calling our family to. You can either submit to His will or…” He shrugged. “…you can fight against the Most High.”

The pasta sauce was burning now. I could smell it. But I couldn’t move. Couldn’t think. Couldn’t process that the man I loved was holding Scripture like a weapon against my heart.

“So,” he said, setting his phone down and walking toward the living room, “what’s for dinner? I’m starving.”

* The opening story above is a composite drawn from real experiences shared with us by women in Torah-observant communities. Names and details have been changed to protect privacy.

If this story sounds familiar, you’re not alone.

Over the years, I’ve witnessed this scenario play out more times than I care to count — in my inbox, text messages, in conversations, and across the broader Hebraic faith community. This isn’t isolated to one group or one teacher. Even entire camps have embraced this doctrine wholesale. I am personally aware of a pastor on YouTube who calls on the Name of Yah who has three wives — and his most recent wife was taken from another married man. Those who know, know. Truly, a dangerous doctrine has taken root, claiming that multiple wives isn’t just permitted, but represents Abba’s original design — the ancient Hebrew path to which we should return.

It’s time to test this claim against Scripture itself, starting with what we’re actually discussing.

Inside This Article

📖 Reading Guide: This is a thorough study — allow 45–60 minutes to read straight through. It is presented in four parts, all on this page. Use the Table of Contents above to jump directly to what you need most right now.
Part One
The Foundation — Yahuah’s Original Design & How We Got Here

Defining the Terms

Monogamy refers to the covenant union of one man and one woman. This is the pattern Yahuah established at creation (Genesis 2:24) and the standard this article defends.

Polygamy refers to any person—male or female—being married to two or more people at the same time.

Polygyny specifically refers to a man being married to two or more women at the same time. This is the practice being promoted in some Torah communities today.

Polyandry refers to a woman being married to two or more men simultaneously.

For this article, we’re addressing both polygamy (multiple spouses) and polygyny (one man, multiple wives). Since polygyny is what’s actually being promoted in our communities, we’ll focus there and use “multiple wives” as our shorthand.

A Critical Distinction: Presence Does Not Equal Endorsement

While polygyny appears in Scripture, its presence is not an endorsement. The Word of Yahuah records both righteous actions and human failures to teach us what happens when people depart from His perfect design.

The Bible also records:

  • Lot’s daughters committing incest (Genesis 19:30-38)
  • David’s adultery and murder (2 Samuel 11)
  • Abraham’s lie about Sarah (Genesis 20:2)
  • Solomon’s idolatry (1 Kings 11:4-10)

We don’t practice these things simply because they’re recorded. We learn from the consequences shown.

Yahuah’s Original Design: One Man, One Woman

From the very beginning, before sin entered the world, Yahuah established His perfect pattern for marriage:

“For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.”
— Genesis 2:24 (TS2009)

Notice the precision of this blueprint:

  • “A man” — singular
  • “His wife”[H802] — singular, not “wives”
  • “One flesh”[H259] — a complete union

The Mathematics of “One Flesh”

Equation Result
One man + one woman = one flesh ✓
One man + two women = fractured flesh ❌

The very concept of “one flesh” becomes impossible with multiple partners. You cannot become “one” with multiple people—it’s spiritually, emotionally, and mathematically contradictory.

Yahusha Confirms This Design

When the Pharisees tested Yahusha about divorce, He pointed them back to the beginning:

“Did you not read that He who made them at the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So that they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore, what Elohim has joined together, let man not separate.”
— Matthew 19:4-6 (TS2009)

Critical observations:

  1. “At the beginning” — before the fall, before cultural accommodations
  2. “Male and female” — one of each, reflecting the image of Elohim
  3. “Twain shall be one” — two become one, not three or four become one
  4. “What Elohim hath joined together” — Yahuah joins one man to one woman, not one man to multiple women

When Yahusha said, “From the beginning it was not so” (Matthew 19:8, TS2009), He was declaring that anything departing from the Genesis pattern—including polygyny—was a concession to human hardness of heart, not Yahuah’s perfect will.

The Echad Principle

Deuteronomy 6:4 declares: “Hear, O Yisra’ĕl: יהוה our Elohim, יהוה is one!” (TS2009)

This same word—echad (H259, אֶחָד)—is used in Genesis 2:24: “and they shall become one flesh.”

Just as Yahuah is one unified being, marriage is designed to be one unified covenant between one man and one woman. This reflects His very nature.

“Monogamy is ultimately rooted in monotheism and in the concept of imago Dei. Just as [Yahuah] who is one is not involved in promiscuous relationships, so husbands and wives created in [Elohim’s] image are to be monogamous in the marital relationship with each other.”
— Dr. Richard Davidson, as cited by 119 Ministries, “Does the Bible Endorse Polygamy?”

✦ Often Overlooked

Malachi 2:14-15 — Yahuah Speaks Directly

This is one of the most overlooked passages in the entire marriage conversation:

“Yet you say, ‘For what reason?’ Because Yahuah has been witness between you and the wife of your youth, with whom you have dealt treacherously; yet she is your companion and your wife by covenant. But did He not make them one, having a remnant of the Spirit? And why one? He seeks godly offspring.”
— Malachi 2:14-15 (TS2009)

Notice what Yahuah says here:

  • “Wife of your youth” — singular, specific, covenantal
  • “Did He not make them one” — Yahuah Himself appeals to the one-flesh design as the standard
  • “Why one?” — Yahuah answers His own question: “He seeks godly offspring”

This last point connects directly to the research on polygyny’s harm to children. Yahuah designed one-flesh covenant marriage not just for the couple’s benefit — but because covenant unity produces the stable environment in which godly children are raised.

The polygynous household, as every biblical example shows, produces rivalry, favoritism, and generational trauma — the exact opposite of what Yahuah is seeking here.

Even Creation Demonstrates the Pattern

Consider Noah’s Ark—when Yahuah preserved life through the flood:

“Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.”
— Genesis 7:2

The animals entered the ark in pairs: one male with one female. Even in preserving creation, Yahuah demonstrated the male-female pairing design.

While some may note that certain animals (like roosters) mate with multiple hens in nature, this reflects the fall and survival instinct—not Yahuah’s original blueprint for His image-bearers. We are called to a higher standard than animals, as beings created in His image with covenant capacity.

Yahuah’s Poetry Celebrates Singular Devotion

The Song of Solomon—the only book of Scripture devoted entirely to the beauty of marriage—is a love poem between one man and one woman. Its language is exclusively singular throughout:

“My beloved is mine, and I am his.”
— Song of Solomon 2:16

“I am my beloved’s, and my beloved is mine.”
— Song of Solomon 6:3

Exclusivity is not just assumed — it is the entire point of the book. Yahuah didn’t inspire a poem about shared devotion. He inspired a poem about singular, undivided covenant love.

✦ Often Overlooked

Proverbs 5:15-19 — A Direct Command to Delight in One Wife

This passage is rarely cited in these discussions, but it deserves to be front and center:

“Drink water from your own cistern, and running water from your own well… Let your fountain be blessed, and rejoice with the wife of your youth… Let her breasts satisfy you at all times; and be captivated by her love always.”
— Proverbs 5:15-19 (TS2009)

The word translated “captivated” is shagah (H7686, שָׁגָה) — meaning to be intoxicated, ravished, or utterly absorbed. It’s passionate, consuming language — and it’s directed toward one woman, the wife of your youth.

Yahuah isn’t merely tolerating a monogamous marriage here. He is commanding delight in one wife. The “cistern” and “well” imagery is possessive — your own, not shared.

This verse answers the “it’s just not expedient” crowd with a clear rebuttal: singular devotion is not a limitation Yahuah reluctantly allows — it is a joy He commands.

How Polygyny Began: Not Among the Righteous

As Sister Joyful Song points out:

“Lamech, a descendant of Cain, was the first man in history to marry more than one woman at a time. Before Lamech, men were monogamous.”
— Sister Joyful Song

Let’s trace the biblical timeline:

Genesis 4:19 — The First Polygynist

“And Lemeḵ took for himself two wives, the name of one was Aḏah, and the name of the second was Tsillah.”
— Genesis 4:19 (TS2009)

Context matters:

  • Lamech was the 7th generation from Adam through Cain’s line—the line of the first murderer
  • He appears just verses after Cain’s descendant Tubal-Cain invented weapons of violence (Genesis 4:22)
  • Lamech himself boasted of murder (Genesis 4:23-24)

Polygyny first appears in the line of rebellion, violence, and separation from Yahuah—not among the righteous.

After the Flood: A Human Survival Mechanism

After Noah’s flood, polygyny spread again—often as a cultural response to:

  • Protecting widows in societies without social safety nets
  • Forming political alliances between kingdoms
  • Addressing population imbalances after wars
  • Ensuring family lineage and inheritance

As Sister Joyful explains:

“Sometimes polygamy was a means of survival… preventing women from slavery or prostitution. It was a human fix, not Yahuah’s plan.”
— Sister Joyful Song

But human solutions are not divine endorsements. Yahuah works through our brokenness, but that doesn’t sanctify our compromises.

Another critical issue with modern polygyny teaching is the complete disregard for covenant and consent.

What Is Biblical Covenant?

Yahuah is an Elohim of covenant. He doesn’t just “take” Israel—He:

  1. Proposes (I will be your Elohim)
  2. Gives terms (The Ten Commandments/Torah)
  3. Asks for agreement (“All that Yahuah has spoken, we will do” – Exodus 19:8)
  4. Seals it with witnesses (The people themselves, heaven and earth)

Marriage is the same. It requires:

  • Intentionality (not just casual sex)
  • Disclosure (full truth about intentions)
  • Choice (the woman must agree)
  • Covenant (public vows and commitment)
  • Witnesses (community acknowledgment)

The Lie: “We Had Sex, So She’s My Wife”

Some men teach that having sex with a woman makes her your wife automatically.

This is absolutely false for these reasons:

1. It denies the woman choice

As one sister powerfully stated:

“When you lie, you take away a person’s ability to choose. But when you withhold truth, that’s lying. So if you know before you get with a woman that you have the intention of taking on multiple women, that needs to be written down. You need to give her the option of saying ‘No, I don’t want to be your second, third, however many wives. I don’t want to go into covenant with you.'”
— Dr. HD, What She Said Podcast, Episode 26

2. It reduces women to objects

Women are not conquered territory. Sex does not equal ownership.

If sex made you married:

  • Every fornication would be a marriage
  • Every rape would create a marriage
  • Divorce would be impossible (since you’d have hundreds of “wives”)
  • Prostitutes would have thousands of “husbands”

This teaching is manipulation disguised as Torah obedience.

3. Biblical examples show intentional covenant

Look at Isaac and Rebecca (Genesis 24):

  • Abraham’s servant was sent with specific instructions
  • Rebecca’s family was approached
  • Rebecca was asked: “Will you go with this man?” (Genesis 24:58)
  • She said YES
  • She was given servants and sent with honor
  • Isaac received her into his mother’s tent

This was NOT:

  • Casual sex
  • A surprise “you’re my wife now”
  • Done in secret
  • Done without family involvement

This WAS:

  • Intentional courtship
  • Family blessing and involvement
  • The woman’s informed consent
  • Covenant before consummation

As one sister explained:

“Women have choice in the Bible. Would you like to go and be this man’s wife? And she’s like ‘Yeah.’ And they’re like ‘Okay.’ And they send her with women’s servants to go with her… There’s so much more to that covenant story. This idea of ‘Oh, I was feeling her and then we got together and then we had sex and this is my wife now’—you’re not being intentional. You’re showing your unhealed trauma.”
— Dr. HD, What She Said Podcast, Episode 26

Part Two
The Evidence — Biblical Examples & Torah Witness

Biblical Examples: Pain, Not Pattern

Proponents of polygyny often point to Abraham, Jacob, and David as examples. But when we actually read their stories, we find the opposite of blessing—we find strife, jealousy, favoritism, and generational trauma.

“[Yahuah’s] compassion for the polygamist no more justifies polygamy than his compassion for the thief justifies theft. [Yahuah] is merciful, but he calls us to repentance.”
— 119 Ministries, “Does the Bible Endorse Polygamy?”

Sister Joyful Song powerfully observes:

“Abraham didn’t initiate it—Sarah did. Isaac never practiced it. Jacob was tricked into it. None of the patriarchs wanted to be in a polygamous relationship.”
— Sister Joyful Song

Let’s examine each case honestly.

Here are the six biblical examples we examine:

  1. Example 1 — Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar: The beginning of heartbreak — Sarah’s idea, not Yahuah’s command.
  2. Example 2 — Isaac — The Exception That Proves the Rule: The one monogamous patriarch, and what that tells us.
  3. Example 3 — Jacob, Leah, and Rachel: Tricked into tragedy — rivalry, favoritism, and a household in chaos.
  4. Example 4 — David — Political Marriages and Household Chaos: A man after Yahuah’s own heart undone by divided loyalties.
  5. Example 5 — Solomon — The Prophesied Disaster: Warned by Yahuah, ignored the warning, and fell into idolatry.
  6. Example 6 — Elkanah, Hannah, and Peninnah: The “barrenness justification” exposed — and the word Scripture uses for a second wife.
Biblical Record

Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar — The Beginning of Heartbreak

Genesis 16:1-6 — The Story

  • Sarah, unable to conceive, gave her handmaid Hagar to Abraham
  • This was a common ancient Near Eastern practice (documented in the Code of Hammurabi)
  • But it was Sarah’s idea, not Yahuah’s command
  • The moment Hagar conceived, contempt and rivalry entered the household

The Consequences:

“And he went in to Haḡar, and she conceived. And when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes. And Sarai said to Aḇram, ‘My wrong be upon you! I gave my female servant into your bosom. And when she saw that she had conceived, I was despised in her eyes.'”
— Genesis 16:4-5 (TS2009)

Genesis 21:9-10 — The Outcome:

“Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac.”

Yahuah never commanded this arrangement. He worked through it, but the pain it caused is undeniable.

↑ Back to Examples List

Biblical Record

Isaac — The Exception That Proves the Rule

Isaac had only one wife—Rebekah (Genesis 24:67).

Of all the patriarchs, Isaac’s household had the most peace in terms of marital harmony. While his sons still had conflict, there was no wife-against-wife rivalry because there was only one wife.

This is not coincidence. This is the Genesis pattern working.

↑ Back to Examples List

Biblical Record

Jacob, Leah, Rachel — Tricked Into Tragedy

Genesis 29:16-30 — The Deception

  • Jacob loved Rachel and worked 7 years for her hand
  • Laban deceived him and gave him Leah instead
  • Jacob worked another 7 years to also marry Rachel
  • Jacob never wanted two wives—he was tricked

The Consequences:

“And when Yahuah saw that Leah was hated, he opened her womb: but Rachel was barren.”
— Genesis 29:31

Notice the word: “hated” — sane (H8130, שָׂנֵא). Critics sometimes argue this just means “loved less,” but Strong’s is unambiguous: H8130 means to hate, to be an enemy. Not “loved less”—hated. This is the fruit of a divided heart.

Genesis 30:1-2 — Rachel’s Desperation:

“And when Rachel saw that she bare Jacob no children, Rachel envied her sister; and said unto Jacob, Give me children, or else I die.”

Genesis 30:14-16 — Bargaining for Jacob’s Affection:

The sisters literally bargained over who would sleep with Jacob using mandrakes. Leah “hired” Jacob for the night.

The Rivalry Continued Through the Sons:

  • The jealousy between Rachel and Leah transferred to their sons
  • Joseph (Rachel’s son) was favored by Jacob
  • His brothers (Leah’s sons) sold him into slavery (Genesis 37:28)
  • They dipped his coat in blood and broke their father’s heart

This generational trauma—the tribe of Judah’s dysfunction, the betrayal of Joseph—all traces back to polygyny’s root of competition and divided loyalty.

↑ Back to Examples List

Biblical Record

David — Political Marriages and Household Chaos

2 Samuel 3:2-5 lists David’s wives: Michal, Abigail, Ahinoam, Maacah, Haggith, Abital, Eglah—and more

Context: In the Ancient Near East, kings often married daughters of other kings or nobility as political alliances—living peace treaties to prevent war. These were rarely romantic marriages but strategic state arrangements.

The Consequences:

  • 2 Samuel 13 — David’s son Amnon raped his half-sister Tamar (daughter of a different wife)
  • 2 Samuel 13:28-29 — Absalom (another son from another wife) murdered Amnon in revenge
  • 2 Samuel 15 — Absalom later rebelled against David and tried to take the kingdom
  • 2 Samuel 16:22 — Absalom publicly slept with his father’s concubines
  • 1 Kings 1-2 — Sons from different mothers fought over succession, leading to Solomon’s purge

David’s household was marked by rape, murder, rebellion, and civil war—all connected to the rivalries of a polygynous household.

↑ Back to Examples List

Biblical Record

Solomon — The Prophesied Disaster

1 Kings 11:3 — The Numbers:

“And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines. And his wives turned away his heart.”
— 1 Kings 11:3 (TS2009)

1 Kings 11:4 — The Result:

“For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with Yahuah his Elohim.”

This is exactly what Yahuah warned against in Deuteronomy 17:17:

“Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away.”

Solomon’s polygyny led directly to:

  • Idolatry (1 Kings 11:5-8)
  • Yahuah’s anger (1 Kings 11:9)
  • The kingdom being torn away from his descendants (1 Kings 11:11-13)

If any man had “permission” for polygyny, it would have been Solomon—the wisest and wealthiest king. Yet his many wives led to his spiritual downfall and the division of Israel.

↑ Back to Examples List

Biblical Record

Elkanah, Hannah, and Peninnah — The “Barrenness Justification” Exposed

One of the most common arguments for polygyny today is: “What if the first wife can’t have children? Isn’t taking a second wife justified then?”

The story of Elkanah’s household answers that question directly — and painfully.

The Setup (1 Samuel 1:1-7):

  • Elkanah had two wives: Hannah, whom he loved deeply, and Peninnah
  • Peninnah had children. Hannah was barren.
  • Peninnah used Hannah’s barrenness as a weapon against her — year after year, she provoked and taunted Hannah until she wept and could not eat

“And her adversary also provoked her sore, for to make her fret, because Yahuah had shut up her womb. And as he did so year by year, when she went up to the house of Yahuah, so she provoked her; therefore she wept, and did not eat.”
— 1 Samuel 1:6-7 (KJV)

The word translated “adversary” for Peninnah is the Hebrew tsarah (H6869) — a word that also means rival wife, distress, and trouble. It is the same root used in Leviticus 18:18, where Yahuah commands a man not to take a woman as a rival (tsarah) to her sister. The language Scripture uses for a second wife is not “blessing” — it is adversary.

What the Story Reveals:

  • Elkanah loved Hannah — but his love could not protect her from the daily torment of a rival wife in the same household
  • Even his tender words — “Am I not better to you than ten sons?” (1 Samuel 1:8) — could not heal the wound polygyny had created
  • The household was marked by weeping, rivalry, and emotional cruelty — not the peace and community that polygyny advocates promise

And here is what they never mention: Yahuah’s answer to Hannah’s barrenness was not a second wife — it was a miracle. Yahuah opened her womb (1 Samuel 1:19-20) and gave her Samuel, one of the greatest prophets in all of Scripture.

The “solution” that man reached for — adding Peninnah — brought years of torment. The solution Yahuah provided — in His own timing — brought transformation, legacy, and one of the most powerful birth stories in the entire Tanakh.

The “barrenness justification” collapses under Scripture: Yahuah does not solve barrenness through polygyny. He solves it through covenant faithfulness, prayer, and His sovereign timing — just as He did for Hannah, Sarah, Rachel, Rebekah, and Elizabeth. Every barren woman in Scripture whose womb Yahuah opened was in a monogamous covenant at the time of the miracle. Not one received her miracle because her husband took another wife.

↑ Back to Examples List

Torah Regulated It — But NEVER Endorsed It

One of the most commonly misused verses is:

“If he takes another wife, her food, her covering, and her marriage rights are not to be diminished.”
— Exodus 21:10 (TS2009)

People read this and say, “See! Torah allows multiple wives!”

But regulation is not the same as approval.

Understanding Torah’s Protective Regulations

The Torah also regulates:

  • Slavery (Exodus 21:2-11) — but slavery is not Yahuah’s ideal
  • Divorce (Deuteronomy 24:1-4) — but Yahusha said Yahuah hates divorce (Malachi 2:16)
  • Cities of refuge (Numbers 35:11) — because murder happens, not because it’s endorsed

Torah meets people where they are in a fallen world and limits the damage of their sinful choices.

Exodus 21:10 is a damage control law. It says: “If you’re going to do this harmful thing despite it not being My design, at least don’t abuse the first wife in the process.”

Read the Full Passage — Context Changes Everything

There is something even more significant that most people miss when they cite Exodus 21:10 as a justification for polygyny: the verse is not speaking about a man’s free wife at all.

Read the full passage — Exodus 21:7-15. The entire section is addressing the laws protecting Hebrew slave girls and female servants. The specific scenario is a man who takes a Hebrew slave girl as a wife or gives her to his son, and then takes another woman. The protections in verse 10 — food, clothing, and marital rights — are laws Yahuah put in place to prevent the abuse and abandonment of vulnerable women in bondage.

This is not a blanket permission for any man to take a second wife whenever he pleases. It is a protective regulation for one of the most vulnerable categories of women in ancient Israel. Taking it out of that context — and using it to justify modern polygyny — is a misreading of both the text and its intent.

What Yahuah Actually Commands Kings

While Exodus 21:10 regulates polygyny for the common man, Yahuah’s command to kings is absolute:

“Neither shall he multiply horses to himself… Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.”
— Deuteronomy 17:16-17

Notice:

  • Don’t multiply horses (military power)
  • Don’t multiply wives (marital loyalty)
  • Don’t multiply wealth (materialism)

All three are about where the heart is turned. And the specific reason given for wives? “Lest his heart turn away.”

This isn’t about greed—it’s about spiritual fidelity.

Part Three
Dismantling the Arguments — 22 Polygyny Claims Examined & Answered

22 Common Polygyny Claims — Answered

This section addresses every major argument used to justify polygyny — from the most popular objections to misused scriptures to historical and cultural claims. They are answered in order from most commonly encountered to most technical, ending with the historical record.

Here are the 22 claims we examine:

  1. Claim 1 — The “Community Covering” Justification: Polygyny is compassionate provision for women who need a husband and head.
  2. Claim 2 — The Keturah Question: Abraham married again after Sarah, so doesn’t that prove polygyny is acceptable?
  3. Claim 3 — The Levirate Marriage Confusion: Doesn’t the law requiring a man to marry his brother’s widow endorse polygyny?
  4. Claim 4 — “But Kings Had Multiple Wives!”: Doesn’t David and Solomon’s example prove Yahuah permitted it?
  5. Claim 5 — “Yahuah Calls Himself Husband to Both Israel AND Judah”: Doesn’t that make Yahuah Himself a polygynist?
  6. Claim 6 — The Parable of the Ten Virgins: Doesn’t this prove Yahusha is a polygynist bridegroom?
  7. Claim 7 — The Demographics Argument: More women than men means polygyny is necessary.
  8. Claim 8 — The Hall of Faith: Hebrews 11 commends polygynists, so it can’t be sin.
  9. Claim 9 — 2 Samuel 12:8: Yahuah gave David multiple wives, proving divine approval.
  10. Claim 10 — 1 Timothy 3:2 — mias means “first,” so elders are allowed second wives.
  11. Claim 11 — 1 Corinthians 7:2 — The Greek Word Argument: Different words for “own” prove polygyny is permissible for men.
  12. Claim 12 — The Adultery Redefinition: Adultery only applies to married women, so a married man can take additional wives.
  13. Claim 13 — Isaiah 4:1: Prophecy of seven women taking one man proves polygyny in the end times.
  14. Claim 14 — Deuteronomy 21:15: Yahuah gave instructions for men with two wives, so He approves.
  15. Claim 15 — 1 Corinthians 9:5 — The “Sister-Wife” Claim: The apostles traveled with co-wives in polygynous households.
  16. Claim 16 — 1 Timothy 4:1-3 — “Forbidding to Marry”: Anti-polygyny teachers are fulfilling the doctrine of demons.
  17. Claim 17 — Numbers 5: No jealousy test for husbands proves Yahuah allowed male polygyny.
  18. Claim 18 — Numbers 31: Yahuah gave warriors multiple wives, proving divine endorsement.
  19. Claim 19 — Song of Solomon — The “Sister-Wife” Term: The Hebrew proves polygyny is celebrated.
  20. Claim 20 — “It’s Lawful But Not Expedient”: Polygyny is permitted under Torah, just not ideal.
  21. Claim 21 — “Ancient Hebraic Communities Accepted Polygyny”: Rejecting polygyny is a Western Christian imposition.
  22. Claim 22 — The Historical Witnesses: Josephus, Justin Martyr, and Rabbi Gershom prove millennia of acceptance.

Let’s examine each one.

Claim 1: The “Community Covering” Justification

“Polygyny is about caring for women in the community who need provision and covering. A man taking multiple wives is acting in compassion — ensuring that no woman is left without a husband and head. This is actually righteous generosity.”

The Biblical Truth:

Men often claim polygyny is about “helping the community” and “caring for women and children who need provision.”

If that’s true, answer these questions:

Question 1: Why Not Care for Widows?

“What about the widow? What about the orphan? If it’s not about sex, then there are a bunch of older women who are widows whose husbands have passed on. They have great qualities. They can come into your house and help your wife to be a better wife and to be a better mother and take some of the stress and strain off of her.”
— Dr. HD, What She Said Podcast, Episode 26

If a man balks at this suggestion, it reveals the truth: It’s not about community—it’s about sex and control.

Scripture actually commands care for widows:

  • 1 Timothy 5:3-16 — Care for widows who are truly in need
  • James 1:27 — “Pure and undefiled religion… is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction”

Why aren’t these “kings” focused on:

  • Mentoring fatherless boys?
  • Providing for elderly widows?
  • Adopting orphans?
  • Supporting single mothers (without requiring sexual access)?

Question 2: Why the Objectification?

If it’s really about helping women:

  • Why must they give sexual access in exchange?
  • Why can’t a man support a woman’s healing without making her a “wife”?
  • Why is every act of provision tied to sexual access?

This is objectification, not godly care.

Question 3: Can You Even Care for One Wife Properly?

Deuteronomy 21:15-17 requires that if a man has multiple wives, he cannot diminish:

  1. Her food
  2. Her clothing
  3. Her marital rights (sexual intimacy)
  4. Her spiritual washing and covering (Ephesians 5:26)

The woman determines if these needs are met—not the man.

Reality check: Many men promoting polygyny:

  • Are struggling to provide for one wife
  • Are not fully present emotionally for one woman
  • Are not washing ONE wife in the Word (Ephesians 5:26)
  • Are not yet leading ONE household in righteousness

As one sister bluntly stated:

“He couldn’t even afford the wife he had—I was paying all the bills while he was jobless. Yet he was focused on getting a second wife. He didn’t ‘believe in assemblies’ either because he didn’t want accountability.”

“If you were so focused on your Creator, how would you have time for three or four different women? How would you have time to actually work out the biblical picture — which is to wash her in the Word and present her before Yahuah without spot or wrinkle? How are you doing that for multiple women if that’s the standard? But if the standard is just sex, then you’ve missed it. You’ve completely misrepresented Yahuah and you’re acting in your own lust.”
— Dr. HD, What She Said Podcast, Episode 26

If you can’t:

  • Pay your current bills
  • Lead your current wife spiritually
  • Resolve conflict in your current relationship
  • Present your current wife spotless before Yahuah

Then you have no business even thinking about another woman.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 2: The Keturah Question

“What about Abraham taking Keturah after Sarah died? Doesn’t that prove polygyny is acceptable? The Bible calls her his ‘wife.'”

The Biblical Truth:

“And Abraham took another wife, and her name was Keturah.”
— Genesis 25:1

Critical Context:

  • Sarah had already died (Genesis 23). This occurred AFTER Abraham’s covenant wife passed away, not during her lifetime.
  • Keturah is also called a “concubine” in 1 Chronicles 1:32, showing her status was different from Sarah’s covenant wife position.
  • Abraham gave everything to Isaac (Genesis 25:5), while Keturah’s sons received only “gifts” and were sent away (Genesis 25:6).

The key distinction:

  • ✓ Abraham had ONE covenant wife at a time — Sarah, then (after her death) Keturah
  • ✗ Abraham did NOT practice simultaneous polygyny during Sarah’s lifetime
  • ✓ This is remarriage after the death of a spouse, not polygyny

Bottom Line on Keturah:

Abraham’s relationship with Keturah occurred after Sarah’s death, making this remarriage, not polygyny. This actually affirms the one-spouse-at-a-time pattern, not contradicts it.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 3: The Levirate Marriage Confusion

“What about Deuteronomy 25:5-10? Doesn’t levirate marriage require a man to marry his brother’s widow even if he’s already married? That’s commanded polygyny!”

The Biblical Truth:

“When brothers dwell together, and one of them dies, and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a stranger outside the family. Her husband’s brother shall go in to her, and take her as his wife…”
— Deuteronomy 25:5-6 (TS2009)

Levirate marriage was a kinsman-redeemer provision designed to preserve the dead brother’s name and inheritance, protect widows, and keep property within the family line.

Critical Points Often Missed:

  • The focus was the deceased brother’s heir, not the living brother acquiring a second wife
  • The text doesn’t explicitly state the brother was already married — young, unmarried brothers were the primary context
  • There was an “out” provision built in (Deuteronomy 25:7-9) — the brother could refuse

Ruth and Boaz — the most famous kinsman-redeemer example — was Boaz, apparently unmarried when he redeemed Ruth, creating a beautiful monogamous covenant that became the lineage of David and Messiah.

Bottom Line on Levirate Marriage:

Levirate marriage was a protective provision for widows and preservation of family inheritance — not a command for polygyny.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 4: “But Kings Had Multiple Wives!”

“If polygyny was so wrong, why did Yahuah allow kings to have multiple wives? Why didn’t He just forbid it outright?”

The Biblical Truth:

Yahuah DID explicitly forbid it for kings.

“Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, lest his heart turn away; neither shall he greatly multiply silver and gold to himself.”
— Deuteronomy 17:17

Every king who disobeyed this command suffered consequences. Solomon’s direct violation led to idolatry, Yahuah’s anger, and the division of the kingdom — exactly as the command warned.

Bottom Line on Kings and Polygyny:

Yahuah explicitly commanded kings not to multiply wives (Deuteronomy 17:17). Yahuah allowing something ≠ Yahuah endorsing something.

“When there is silence in the scriptures, all you can say is that [Yahuah] did not say — we cannot put words into [Yahuah’s] mouth.”
— 119 Ministries, “Does the Bible Endorse Polygamy?”

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 5: “Yahuah Calls Himself Husband to Both Israel AND Judah”

“In Jeremiah 3:14, Yahuah says He’s married to Israel. In Ezekiel 23, He speaks of taking two sisters (Israel and Judah) as wives. If Yahuah Himself practiced polygyny in His relationship with His people, how can it be wrong?”

The Biblical Truth:

This objection fundamentally misunderstands prophetic metaphor.

If we take this literally, we must also accept:

  • Yahuah “divorced” Israel (Jeremiah 3:8) — but Yahuah says He hates divorce (Malachi 2:16)
  • The “sisters” committed adultery (Ezekiel 23:37) — meaning Yahuah’s “wives” were unfaithful
  • Yahuah executed judgment on His “wives” (Ezekiel 23:45-47) — is this a marriage model?

The moment you take prophetic metaphor literally, it collapses into theological absurdity. The New Testament clarifies: Messiah has ONE Bride — the assembly (Revelation 21:2, 9; Ephesians 5:31-32).

Bottom Line:

This is prophetic metaphor, not marriage instruction. The New Testament clarifies: Messiah has ONE Bride — confirming the one-flesh design from Genesis.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 6: “The Parable of the Ten Virgins Proves Yahusha Is a Polygynist Bridegroom”

“In Matthew 25, the ten virgins are betrothed brides waiting for the bridegroom — not bridesmaids. Since Yahusha is the bridegroom and there are ten brides, He is modeling His Father’s polygynous pattern. This parable endorses polygyny.”

The Biblical Truth:

Yahusha gave the Parable of the Ten Virgins in Matthew 25 as part of His extended teaching on readiness for the Kingdom — the same discourse that includes the Parable of the Talents and the Sheep and the Goats. The entire context is about being spiritually prepared when He returns, not about marriage structure. The oil represents the Holy Spirit — spiritual readiness, relationship with Yahuah. Five had it. Five didn’t. This is about preparedness, not polygyny.

Their specific claims examined:

They argue the virgins are betrothed brides because: (1) there is no Hebraic precedent for bridesmaids, (2) the Greek word parthenos suggests betrothal, and (3) no separate “bride” is mentioned — implying the virgins are the bride. Each of these fails.

Ancient Hebraic weddings absolutely included female attendants who accompanied the procession to meet the groom — this is documented in rabbinic literature. The virgins go out to meet the groom — the role of attendants, not brides waiting at home. Parthenos simply means virgin or young unmarried woman — it does not imply betrothal. And the absence of an explicitly named bride is an argument from silence that proves too much.

The fatal flaw: If the ten virgins are ten brides and five are shut out — what does that say about Yahusha? That He shuts five of His own brides out of His own wedding? This creates a theological disaster. The parable only makes sense when the virgins are attendants, not brides.

What Revelation actually says:

“Let us be glad and rejoice and give Him glory, for the marriage of the Lamb has come, and His wife has made herself ready.”
— Revelation 19:7

Wife — singular. His wife — one Bride. Revelation 21:9 calls the New Jerusalem “the Bride, the Lamb’s wife” — again, singular. If Yahusha were modeling polygynous structure, Revelation would say “His wives.” It doesn’t.

Bottom Line on the Ten Virgins:

The parable is about spiritual readiness for the Kingdom — not marriage structure. The virgins are attendants, not ten brides. The New Testament explicitly describes Messiah’s Bride as singular (Revelation 19:7, 21:9). Using a preparedness parable to justify polygyny is a profound misreading of both the parable and New Testament marriage theology.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 7: The Demographics Argument

“There are more women than men in the world—especially in the church/assembly. Polygyny solves this imbalance and ensures every woman can have a husband and covering.”

The Biblical Truth:

This argument has multiple fatal flaws — both factually and biblically.

1. The demographic premise is false

According to the World Bank and UN population data, the global male-to-female ratio is approximately 101 males per 100 females. Among marriage-age adults (20-40), the ratio is nearly equal. The “women outnumber men dramatically” claim is simply not true in most contexts.

2. Scripture affirms singleness as a valid, even preferable calling for some

“But I say to the unmarried and to widows, it is good for them if they remain even as I.”
— 1 Corinthians 7:8-9

Yahusha Himself was single. Paul was single. The idea that women must be married to have value or purpose contradicts Scripture.

3. If demographics justified marriage structure, what about areas where men outnumber women?

In China, India, and many frontier regions, men significantly outnumber women. Should polyandry (one woman, multiple husbands) be practiced there? Of course not. This reveals the argument’s fatal flaw: Yahuah’s design for marriage doesn’t change based on population statistics.

Bottom Line on Demographics:

The demographic “imbalance” is largely a myth. Even if there were an imbalance, it wouldn’t justify polygyny because Scripture affirms singleness as a valid calling and marriage is a covenant, not a social program. This argument reduces women to problems needing solutions rather than honoring them as image-bearers with direct access to Yahuah.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 8: The Hall of Faith — Does It Vindicate Polygyny?

“Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Gideon, and David are all in the Hall of Faith (Hebrews 11) and were polygynists. Since 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 says adulterers won’t inherit the Kingdom, and these men weren’t excluded — polygyny must not be among the disqualifying sins.”

The Biblical Truth:

This argument contains a logical error so significant it actually defeats itself.

The error: it confuses what someone is commended for with blanket approval of everything they ever did.

Hebrews 11 commends these men for specific acts of faith:

  • Abraham is commended for obeying Yahuah’s call and offering Isaac
  • Jacob is commended for blessing Joseph’s sons in faith
  • Moses is commended for choosing affliction with Yahuah’s people over Egypt’s pleasures
  • David is commended as a man of faith and devotion — not for his marriages

The Hall of Faith does not say: “Everything these men did was righteous, therefore everything they did is permitted.”

Apply this logic consistently and it collapses immediately:

David is in the Hall of Faith — and David committed adultery with Bathsheba and had Uriah murdered. Samson is in the Hall of Faith (Hebrews 11:32) — and Samson visited a prostitute (Judges 16:1). Lot is called righteous in 2 Peter 2:7 — and Lot committed incest with his daughters (Genesis 19:30-38).

Does the Hall of Faith vindicate adultery, murder, prostitution, and incest?

Of course not. And no one argues that it does — except, somehow, when it comes to polygyny.

Yahuah’s grace covers His people’s failures. Being used mightily by Yahuah despite your sin, or being commended for your faith in specific acts, does not mean all your practices were endorsed. These men are in the Hall of Faith because of their belief and obedience in the moments being cited — not because every aspect of their lives was Yahuah’s ideal.

The polygynous households of these very same men produced rivalry, jealousy, rape, murder, rebellion, and idolatry — documented in detail above. The Hall of Faith vindicates their faith. The narrative chapters of their lives document the consequences of their choices. Both are true simultaneously. One does not cancel the other.

Torah Regulated It — But NEVER Endorsed It

One of the most commonly misused verses is:

“If he takes another wife, her food, her covering, and her marriage rights are not to be diminished.”
— Exodus 21:10 (TS2009)

People read this and say, “See! Torah allows multiple wives!”

But regulation is not the same as approval.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 9: 2 Samuel 12:8 — “I Gave You Your Master’s Wives”

“Yahuah Himself gave David multiple wives! Therefore polygyny has divine approval!”

The Biblical Truth:

This verse is perhaps the most misused in the entire polygyny debate.

“And I gave thee thy master’s house, and thy master’s wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things.”
— 2 Samuel 12:8

The Context: This is part of Nathan the prophet’s rebuke of David after his adultery with Bathsheba and murder of Uriah. Yahuah is not blessing David—He’s confronting his sin.

Understanding “Your Master’s Wives”

In Ancient Near Eastern royal succession:

  • When a king died or was overthrown, his household—including his harem—became the property of the new king
  • This was a political transfer of state property, not romantic relationships
  • Taking the former king’s wives/concubines was a public declaration of legitimate succession

2 Samuel 16:21-22 shows this practice: When Absalom rebelled, his advisor told him to publicly sleep with David’s concubines to show he had taken full power. This was about political dominance, not marriage.

The Phrase “I Would Have Given You Such and Such Things”

Yahuah is saying: “I gave you the kingdom, the house, the authority—I would have given you even more blessings (armies, territories, honor)—why did you take something that wasn’t yours?”

The phrase “such and such things” refers to legitimate blessings—more land, more victories, more honor. Nowhere does Scripture suggest this means “more wives.”

This verse is a rebuke for David’s lust and misuse of power—not authorization for polygyny.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 10: 1 Timothy 3:2 — “Husband of One Wife”

“The Greek word mias means ‘first,’ not ‘one.’ So Paul is saying an elder must be the husband of a first wife, implying second wives are allowed for others!”

The Biblical Truth:

This is where the linguistic deception gets dangerous.

“A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour…”
— 1 Timothy 3:2

This claim is linguistically false and easily disproven.

The Actual Greek Text

μιᾶς γυναικὸς ἄνδρα (mias gynaikos andra)

Literally: “a one-woman man”

Greek Word Transliteration Strong’s Meaning
μιᾶς mias G3391 one (feminine genitive singular of εἷς)
γυναικὸς gynaikos G1135 wife/woman (genitive singular)
ἄνδρα andra G435 man/husband (accusative singular)

The Word for “First” in Greek

If Paul wanted to say “first wife,” he would have used πρῶτος (protos, G4413) — the actual Greek word for “first.”

Examples of protos (G4413) in the New Testament:

  • Matthew 20:27 — “Whosoever will be chief (protos) among you…”
  • Mark 12:28 — “Which is the first (protos) commandment?”
  • Luke 2:2 — “This taxing was first (protos) made…”

Paul knew the word for “first.” He didn’t use it. He used μιᾶς — ONE.

How Do We Know Mias Means “One,” Not “First”?

  1. Paul uses the same phrase in Titus 1:6:

    “If any be blameless, the husband of one wife…” — Titus 1:6
    Same exact Greek: μιᾶς γυναικὸς ἄνδρα

  2. The phrase appears consistently in both passages about elder qualifications — showing it’s a standard moral requirement, not a technical ranking of wives.
  3. Every major Greek lexicon defines μιᾶς as “one” in this context:
    • Thayer’s Greek Lexicon: “one” (numerical)
    • BDAG (Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich): “one, only one”
    • Strong’s Concordance: G3391 — “one”
  4. A note on Strong’s numbering: Some readers notice that different Bible software assigns different Strong’s numbers to this word — G3391 (mia) in some tools, G1520 (heis) in others. This is not a discrepancy in the Greek text. Mia (G3391) is the irregular feminine form of heis (G1520) — they are the same word, declined for grammatical gender. Some tools catalog the feminine form separately under G3391; others fold it under the root entry G1520. Either way, every lexicon defines the word identically: one. The meaning is not in dispute across any resource.
  5. Context confirms monogamy: The same passage requires deacons to be “husbands of one wife” (1 Timothy 3:12)—establishing a church-wide standard, not a special requirement only for elders.
  6. Out of 343 New Testament occurrences of heis/mias, it’s translated as “first” only 8 times—and only in Hebraic calendar idioms:
    • “Day one” of the week = “first day” (a Hebrew idiom preserved in Greek)
    • These are the ONLY exceptions, not the rule

Why Would Anyone Teach This Falsehood?

The honest answer: Because they need to justify polygyny and this verse stands directly against it.

When Scripture clearly contradicts what someone wants to practice, they have two choices:

  1. Submit to Scripture and change their behavior
  2. Twist Scripture to match their desires

This “mias means first” argument is linguistic fabrication—pseudo-scholarship designed to:

  • Give false authority to a desired interpretation
  • Confuse people who don’t know Greek
  • Create doubt about what Scripture plainly teaches

2 Peter 3:16 warns about this exact practice:

“as also in all his letters, speaking in them concerning these matters, in which some are hard to understand, which those who are untaught and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do also the other Scriptures.”
— 2 Peter 3:16 (TS2009)

As one commenter insightfully noted under a related teaching:

“If Paul wanted to say ‘first wife,’ he would have used proton or protos.”
— @BrotherNick777

The argument that mias means “first” is a linguistic fabrication used to justify what Scripture condemns.

What “One-Woman Man” Actually Means

This phrase emphasizes exclusive devotion and faithfulness:

  • Not a man with a wandering eye
  • Not a man involved with multiple women
  • Not a man who was polygynous
  • A man fully devoted to one wife

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 11: 1 Corinthians 7:2 — The Greek Word Argument

“In 1 Corinthians 7:2, Paul uses two different Greek words for ‘own.’ For ‘his own wife,’ he uses heautou[G1438] — exclusive ownership. But for ‘her own husband,’ he uses idios[G2398] — which implies shared or non-exclusive ownership. This proves a husband is not exclusively his wife’s, while a wife is exclusively her husband’s — making polygyny permissible for men.”

The Biblical Truth:

This is one of the more sophisticated-sounding arguments in the polygyny toolkit — and it falls apart the moment you open an actual Greek lexicon.

What idios (G2398) actually means:

The claim that idios implies shared or non-exclusive ownership is simply false. Here is how idios is used elsewhere in the New Testament:

  • “his own country” (Matthew 9:1) — does a man share his hometown with strangers?
  • “his own sheep” (John 10:3-4) — the shepherd’s own sheep, as opposed to strangers’
  • “his own Son” (Romans 8:32) — Yahuah gave His own Son — shared with others?
  • “his own body” — used in the very same passage, 1 Corinthians 7:4

Idios means one’s own, particular, private, belonging to oneself — the exact opposite of shared. BDAG defines it: “pertaining to oneself, one’s own.” Thayer’s defines it: “pertaining to one’s self, one’s own, belonging to one’s self.”

Why does Paul use two different words at all?

Heautou is a reflexive pronoun — it refers back grammatically to the subject of the sentence. Idios is a simple possessive adjective. The difference is grammatical, not theological. Paul uses whichever form fits the sentence structure. He is not embedding a secret teaching about exclusive vs. shared ownership in a pronoun choice.

What the passage actually establishes:

Read verses 2-4 together:

“Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband. Let the husband render to his wife what is her due, and likewise also the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does.”
— 1 Corinthians 7:2-4

Notice verse 4: the husband does not have authority over his own body — the wife does. Paul is establishing mutual exclusivity and mutual obligation between one husband and one wife. Each belongs wholly to the other. If polygyny were permitted, verse 4 would be incoherent. How can multiple wives simultaneously have authority over one husband’s body?

Bottom Line on the Greek Word Argument:

The claim that idios implies shared ownership is linguistically false and contradicted by every standard Greek lexicon and hundreds of New Testament examples. 1 Corinthians 7:2-4 establishes mutual exclusivity — each spouse belongs wholly to the other — which is structurally incompatible with polygyny.

1 Timothy 3:2–12 — Overseers AND Deacons

In this single chapter, Paul establishes the standard for two different leadership roles:

Verse 2 — Overseers (Bishops/Pastors):

“An overseer then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach.”

Greek: μιᾶς γυναικὸς ἄνδρα (mias gynaikos andra)

Verse 12 — Deacons:

“Let deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.”

Greek: μιᾶς γυναικὸς ἄνδρες (mias gynaikos andres) — plural form, but same phrase

Titus 1:5–6 — Elders

When Paul instructs Titus to appoint elders in Crete:

“If anyone is above reproach, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of dissipation or insubordination.”

Greek: μιᾶς γυναικὸς ἄνηρ (mias gynaikos anēr) — same construction, different case

1 Peter 3:7 — Complementary Principle

While Peter doesn’t use the exact phrase, he reinforces the unity and exclusivity of marriage:

“Husbands, likewise, dwell with them with understanding, giving honor to the wife as to the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life…”

Notice the singular form:

  • “The wife” (not “wives”)
  • Peter is addressing ALL husbands, not just leaders
  • Yet he assumes the pattern: one husband, one wife
  • “Together” (unified partnership between two)
  • “Heirs together of the grace of life” (shared spiritual inheritance)

This is crucial: If polygyny were an acceptable practice for ordinary believers, Peter would have said “giving honor to your wives” (plural). But he didn’t. Even when giving general instruction to all married men in the assembly, Peter uses the singular—one wife.

Ephesians 5:31–33 — The Pattern Behind the Pattern

Paul compares marriage to Messiah and His Bride:

“For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh… This mystery is great, but I speak concerning Messiah and the assembly.”

Here the pattern of one man + one woman = one flesh is applied directly to Messiah and the assembly—the single, unified Bride.

A Note on the Bride Metaphor

Some teachers have raised questions about whether Yahusha is literally in the role of Bridegroom. Scripture itself settles this clearly. John the Immerser identifies Him directly: “The one who has the bride is the bridegroom” (John 3:29). Yahusha uses the same language of Himself (Matthew 9:15). And Revelation 19:7 declares: “the marriage of the Lamb has come, and His wife prepared herself.”

It is important to understand, however, that this is covenant metaphor, not a literal family relationship. Scripture describes believers as children of Yahuah, brothers of Messiah, living stones in a temple, members of a body — and also as the Bride. These are different pictures of the same covenant reality: Yahuah’s faithful, exclusive love for His redeemed people.

When Paul draws on this imagery in Ephesians 5, his point is about the nature of the covenant — singular, faithful, and whole. Just as Messiah does not divide Himself among multiple assemblies, a husband is not to divide himself among multiple wives. The metaphor holds precisely because both relationships are designed to be undivided.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 12: “Adultery Only Applies to Married Women — So a Married Man Can Take Another Wife”

“Biblically, adultery is only defined as a man sleeping with another man’s wife. The Hebrew word na’aph (H5003) means ‘a woman who breaks wedlock’ — so the man’s marital status is irrelevant. A married man sleeping with an unmarried woman isn’t adultery. It’s just adding a wife. Dictionaries like Easton’s, Smith’s, and the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia all confirm this.”

The Biblical Truth:

The Truth: This argument is half-true in the most dangerous way possible — it takes a technical legal definition from the Mosaic civil code and uses it to override the entire moral standard of Scripture, including Yahusha’s own words.

Yes — the OT civil definition of adultery was legally tied to the woman’s marital status

This is true. In the Mosaic legal code, the crime of adultery was defined specifically as a man (married or single) having relations with a married or betrothed woman. The reason was practical and serious: it violated another man’s covenant, corrupted the family line, and created inheritance confusion. Under this framework, a married man having relations with an unmarried woman was not classified as adultery under Mosaic civil law — it was classified as fornication (zanah, H2181) or sexual immorality.

The polygyny advocates stop here. But Scripture doesn’t.

Yahusha explicitly raised the standard beyond the legal definition

“You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
— Matthew 5:27-28

Notice what Yahusha is doing here. He is taking a known legal standard and raising it. Not lowering it. Not clarifying a loophole. Raising it. Under the old legal framework, you had to physically sleep with a married woman for it to be adultery. Under Yahusha’s standard, even looking with lust is adultery in the heart. If anything, this argument destroys the polygyny position. If looking at a woman with desire is already adultery in the heart, how much more is pursuing a sexual relationship outside the one-flesh covenant?

The New Covenant standard covers all sexual immorality — full stop

“Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body.”
— 1 Corinthians 6:18

“Marriage is honorable among all, and the bed undefiled; but fornicators and adulterers Elohim will judge.”
— Hebrews 13:4

The Greek word for sexual immorality here is porneia (G4202) — an umbrella term covering all sexual activity outside of a lawful, covenant marriage. You cannot create a second “covenant” without Yahuah’s authorization — and Yahuah’s authorization requires the consent of the first wife, the community, the family, and a public covenant. Secretly pursuing a second woman while already married is not “adding a wife.” It is porneia.

Follow the logic where it leads

Let’s apply the PDF’s adultery definition consistently:

  • A married man hiring a prostitute is not committing adultery (she’s not married)
  • A married man sleeping with his single female employee is not committing adultery
  • A married man sleeping with any unmarried woman in his congregation is not committing adultery

Does that sound like the character of Yahuah to you?

This is not Torah. This is a license for predatory behavior dressed in Hebrew vocabulary.

What about the dictionaries they cite?

Easton’s, Smith’s, and the ISBE are 19th and early 20th century reference works useful for understanding historical and legal definitions — but they describe the civil law definition of adultery under Mosaic covenant, not the full moral standard of Scripture. None of them claim that a married man sleeping with an unmarried woman is morally acceptable or pleasing to Yahuah. Using a 19th century dictionary entry about Mosaic civil law to override Yahusha’s direct moral teaching in Matthew 5 is not biblical scholarship. It is selective citation in service of a predetermined conclusion.

Bottom Line on the Adultery Redefinition

Yes, the narrow civil definition of adultery in Mosaic law was tied to the woman’s marital status. But Yahusha explicitly raised the moral standard beyond that legal floor in Matthew 5:27-28. The New Covenant forbids all porneia — sexual immorality of every kind. A married man pursuing a second “wife” — whether or not his first wife consents — outside of Yahuah’s one-flesh design, is not practicing righteous Torah. He is committing sexual immorality and breaking covenant with the wife of his youth — which Yahuah calls treachery (Malachi 2:14).

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 13: Isaiah 4:1 — “Seven Women Shall Take Hold of One Man”

“This is prophecy showing that polygyny will be practiced in the end times as a righteous pattern!”

The Biblical Truth:

The Truth: Read the context. Isaiah 3-4 describes judgment and devastation:

Isaiah 3:25-26:

“Thy men shall fall by the sword, and thy mighty in the war. And her gates shall lament and mourn; and she being desolate shall sit upon the ground.”

Isaiah 4:1 describes the aftermath of war where:

  • So many men have been killed that women outnumber men 7 to 1
  • Women are so desperate to avoid the shame of childlessness that they’ll support themselves just to bear a man’s name
  • They’ll “eat their own bread” and “wear their own apparel” — meaning they’ll provide for themselves

This is a description of TRAGEDY and DESPERATION, not a prescription for righteous marriage.

Descriptive does not equal prescriptive.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 14: Deuteronomy 21:15 — “If a Man Have Two Wives”

“Yahuah is giving instructions for men with two wives, so He must approve!”

The Biblical Truth:

The Truth: This is another regulatory law, not an endorsement. The verse continues with instructions to protect the firstborn son’s inheritance even if he’s from the “hated” (less-loved) wife.

The law essentially says: “Since you’ve created this mess with two wives and playing favorites, at least don’t punish the son of the wife you don’t love.”

Protection does not equal permission.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 15: 1 Corinthians 9:5 — Did the Apostles Have Multiple Wives?

“The literal Greek of 1 Corinthians 9:5 reads adelphēn gynaika — ‘sister-wife.’ Paul was acknowledging that the apostles traveled with sister-wives, meaning co-wives in a polygynous household. This proves polygyny was practiced in the early assembly.”

The Biblical Truth:

The Truth: This argument misunderstands basic Greek grammar and ignores the plain context of the passage entirely.

What the Greek actually says:

The phrase adelphēn gynaika (ἀδελφὴν γυναῖκα) — adelphē[G80] (sister/fellow believer) + gynē[G1135] (wife) — is two words used as an adjective modifying a noun. It means “a wife who is a sister in the faith” — a believing wife, a wife who is also a fellow believer in Messiah. This is standard Greek apposition. It is exactly how every major translation has rendered it for two thousand years: “a believing wife” (ESV, NIV, NASB) or “a sister, a wife” (KJV — correctly capturing both elements).

What the passage is actually about:

“Do we not have the right to eat and drink? Do we not have the right to take along a believing wife, as do also the other apostles and the brothers of the Master and Kĕpha?”
— 1 Corinthians 9:4-5 (TS2009)

Paul is defending the rights of apostles to receive support from the assemblies they serve — including the right to be married and have their wives travel with them. He is arguing for the legitimacy of having a wife, not for having multiple wives. If this passage were about co-wives in the polygynous sense, Paul would be arguing: “We have the right to bring all our wives on ministry trips.” That is not the argument being made.

The “sister-wife” term as used by polygynists today is a modern coinage popularized by a reality television program. Importing that term back into 1st-century Greek to find hidden polygyny endorsement is anachronistic and linguistically unsupportable.

Bottom Line on 1 Corinthians 9:5:

Adelphēn gynaika means “a wife who is a sister in the faith” — a believing wife. Paul is defending the right of apostles to be married and have their wives accompanied and supported during ministry travel. This passage has nothing to do with polygyny.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 16: 1 Timothy 4:1-3 — Are Anti-Polygyny Teachers Teaching “Doctrines of Demons”?

“Paul warns that in the last days, some will ‘forbid to marry’ as a doctrine of demons. Those who teach that polygyny is wrong are literally fulfilling this prophecy — forbidding men from taking additional wives.”

The Biblical Truth:

The Truth: This is perhaps the most spiritually manipulative argument in the entire polygyny toolkit, because it attempts to invert everything — making you the false teacher for holding to Yahuah’s design.

What Paul was actually addressing:

“But the Spirit distinctly says that in latter times some shall fall away from the belief, paying attention to misleading spirits and teachings of demons, speaking lies in hypocrisy, having been branded on their own conscience — forbidding to marry, saying to abstain from foods which Elohim created to be received with thanksgiving.”
— 1 Timothy 4:1-3 (TS2009)

Paul pairs “forbidding to marry” with “abstaining from foods” — two practices that reject physical, created goods as inherently corrupt or spiritually inferior. This is the hallmark of Gnosticism and asceticism — the false teaching that the body and its appetites are evil, and therefore marriage, sex, and food should be avoided by the truly spiritual. Paul was rebuking people who said “Don’t marry at all — the body is corrupt.” He was not addressing people who said “Marry — but honor the one-flesh design from Genesis.”

These are opposite positions:

  • Forbidding marriage altogether = doctrine of demons ✓ (Paul’s target)
  • Upholding Yahuah’s design for covenant marriage as one man, one woman = Genesis 2:24, Matthew 19:4-6, 1 Timothy 3:2

Applying Paul’s rebuke of asceticism to those who uphold covenant marriage is not exegesis — it is manipulation. Ask the person making this argument: “Are you saying that Paul — who wrote ‘husband of one wife’ three times — was himself teaching a doctrine of demons?” Because that is the logical conclusion of their position.

Bottom Line on 1 Timothy 4:

Paul was rebuking ascetic movements that rejected marriage and physical life as spiritually corrupt — not rebuking those who hold to the one-flesh covenant design. Applying this passage to opponents of polygyny is a dishonest inversion of its meaning. It is spiritual manipulation, not biblical scholarship.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 17: Numbers 5 — Why Is There No Jealousy Test for Husbands?

“Numbers 5 provides a jealousy test for a wife’s unfaithfulness but no equivalent test for a husband. This proves Yahuah didn’t consider a husband’s sexual activity with other women to be unfaithfulness — because polygyny is acceptable for men.”

The Biblical Truth:

The Truth: The purpose of the jealousy test has nothing to do with validating or invalidating polygyny. Understanding why the test existed explains everything.

The jealousy test — the sotah ritual — existed only for wives because of lineage, inheritance, and genealogical integrity:

  • In ancient Israel, tribal inheritance, priestly succession, land rights, and covenant identity all flowed through the paternal line
  • A wife secretly carrying another man’s child would corrupt the family line and inheritance without anyone knowing
  • A man could not secretly insert another man’s child into the lineage — the question of his own paternity was the concern for his wife, not for him
  • The test was about ensuring the husband’s child was truly his — protecting the integrity of the covenant genealogy

This is not about permitting male promiscuity. It is about protecting the covenant bloodline. Furthermore, the argument proves too much: there is also no jealousy test for murder or idolatry — so are those acceptable too? The absence of a specific legal procedure does not equal permission.

A note on gendered legal language: Throughout Torah, laws addressed to “a man” (ish) apply to all of Israel — male and female — unless the text specifically limits the law to one sex, as it does with laws concerning menstruation or childbirth. In those cases, Scripture says so explicitly. The absence of that explicit limitation here means this passage does not create a special male exemption. This is consistent hermeneutical practice across all of Torah.

A note on gendered legal language: throughout Torah, laws addressed to “a man” (ish) apply to all of Israel — male and female — unless the text specifically limits the law to one sex, as it does with laws concerning menstruation or childbirth. This is consistent hermeneutical practice and is not unique to this passage.

Bottom Line on Numbers 5:

The jealousy test existed to protect the integrity of the covenant genealogical line. Its absence for husbands reflects the different genealogical consequences of male vs. female infidelity in covenant Israel. It is not permission for male sexual freedom.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 18: Numbers 31 — Did Yahuah Give Warriors Multiple Wives?

“In Numbers 31, Yahuah commanded that 32,000 virgin girls be distributed among 12,000 warriors. Since not all men could receive exactly one virgin, some received multiple — meaning Yahuah Himself gave some men multiple wives. This is divine endorsement of polygyny.”

The Biblical Truth:

The Truth: This argument requires inserting several things into the text that are simply not there.

Numbers 31 records the Israelite military campaign against Midian. The 32,000 virgin girls who remained were distributed as plunder — divided between soldiers, congregation, and Levites. Notice that the text places the virgins in the same category as sheep (675,000), cattle (72,000), donkeys (61,000), gold, silver, and ornaments. The virgins are distributed as spoils of war alongside livestock and precious metals. The text does not say they became wives.

Torah’s separate provision for marrying a captive woman (Deuteronomy 21:10-14) requires a mandatory full month of mourning, after which he may take her as a wife — and if he later decides he doesn’t want her, he must release her free. This is a protective regulation, not a command to take multiple wives.

The text also doesn’t say each soldier received exactly 2.67 virgins. Many of the virgins may have been children. And if Yahuah had intended each soldier to receive a new wife, the text would say so — as explicitly as it describes the cattle and gold.

Bottom Line on Numbers 31:

The text distributes virgins as spoils of war alongside livestock and gold — it does not say they became wives. Reading polygynous endorsement into a war spoils distribution list is importing meaning the text simply does not contain.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 19: Song of Solomon — Was Solomon Addressing a “Sister-Wife”?

“The Song of Solomon contains the Hebrew term achot kallah — which literally means ‘sister-wife.’ This proves the poem celebrates polygynous marriage. Modern translations dropped the word ‘wife’ to hide this.”

The Biblical Truth:

The Truth: This argument is built on a misunderstanding of ancient Near Eastern love poetry that any standard Hebrew commentary resolves immediately.

The phrase achot kallah (אֲחֹתִי כַלָּה) contains two words: achot (H269 — sister, or a term of endearment for a beloved woman) and kallah (H3618 — bride, betrothed woman). The phrase is a double term of endearment — “my sister, my bride” — not a compound noun meaning “co-wife.” The words stand in apposition, each adding a layer of intimacy.

This same “sister” language for a beloved woman appears throughout ancient Near Eastern love poetry — Egyptian collections like the Papyrus Chester Beatty, Ugaritic literature, Mesopotamian love songs — all address the beloved as “sister” with no implication of actual siblinghood or co-marriage. It was the ancient equivalent of terms like “darling” or “my love,” expressing closeness and intimacy. It was never a technical term for a co-wife.

No translator “dropped” the word wife — kallah (bride) is already in the text. The pro-polygyny rendering is simply adding a meaning that isn’t there.

And regarding Solomon’s 1,000 wives: Scripture itself records that “his wives turned away his heart” (1 Kings 11:3). The Song of Songs depicts what ideal, singular, consuming love looks like. Solomon described it in poetry and then spent the rest of his life pursuing the opposite — with consequences Yahuah recorded as judgment. The Song of Songs is Yahuah’s picture of what marriage was meant to be. Solomon’s thousand wives are Yahuah’s picture of what happens when you abandon that design.

Bottom Line on Song of Songs:

Achot kallah is a double term of endearment — “my sister, my bride.” It is not a technical term for a co-wife and is used throughout ancient Near Eastern love poetry with no polygynous implication. The Song of Songs celebrates singular, exclusive, consuming love between one man and one woman — the exact opposite of a divided heart.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 20: “It’s Lawful But Not Expedient”

“Polygyny is technically lawful under Torah, just not the best choice—like eating meat versus vegetables.”

The Biblical Truth:

The Truth: This is a dangerous twisting of Paul’s teaching about matters of conscience (Romans 14, 1 Corinthians 8-10).

Paul was addressing:

  • Foods offered to idols
  • Observing certain days
  • Dietary choices

These are morally neutral matters where Scripture gives freedom.

But polygyny is not morally neutral. It violates:

  • The Genesis design (Matthew 19:4-6)
  • The one-flesh principle (Genesis 2:24)
  • The command against multiplying wives (Deuteronomy 17:17)
  • The elder qualification (1 Timothy 3:2)
  • The call to exclusive covenant love

What contradicts Yahuah’s revealed will is not “lawful but not expedient”—it’s sin.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 21: The “Ancient Hebraic Communities Accepted Polygyny” Claim

“Ancient Hebraic communities did not believe in or practice monogamy. Rejecting polygyny is a Western, Christian imposition — not a Hebrew position. Torah-observant people throughout history accepted multiple wives as normal and righteous.”

The Biblical Truth:

Some claim that rejecting polygyny is a Western or Christian position. History says otherwise. The Damascus Document — part of the Dead Sea Scrolls, written by the Qumran community centuries before the Brit Hadashah (New Testament) — explicitly condemns polygyny as one of the three nets of Belial, citing Genesis 1:27 and Genesis 7:9 as its basis. These Torah-observant Hebrews, with no access to Paul’s letters and no Western influence, reached the same conclusion we do: Yahuah’s design from creation is one man and one woman.

A note on our use of this source: The Damascus Document is cited here as a historical witness, not as a scriptural authority. We do not endorse all positions found within this text — including views some have used to support a fixed solar calendar for determining appointed times, which we do not hold. We reference CD 4:20–5:2 solely because it demonstrates that even ancient Torah-observant communities recognized polygyny as a departure from Yahuah’s original design. Scripture remains our final authority on all matters.

↑ Back to Claims List

Claim 22: The Historical Witnesses — Josephus, Justin Martyr & Rabbi Gershom

“Historical records prove polygyny was widely accepted in early Hebrew and Christian communities. Josephus records Herod had nine wives. Justin Martyr acknowledged Hebraic men of his day had multiple wives. And the formal Hebraic ban on polygyny wasn’t enacted until Rabbi Gershom’s ruling around 1000 CE — proving it was accepted for thousands of years.”

The Biblical Truth:

These are real citations. Let’s address each one honestly.

Josephus and Herod’s Nine Wives:

Yes, Josephus records that Herod the Great had nine wives. Josephus also records that Herod murdered his favorite wife Mariamne out of paranoid jealousy, executed his own sons, ordered the massacre of infant boys in Bethlehem, and died in agony that Josephus describes as divine judgment. Herod’s many wives are documented. They are not endorsed — not by Josephus, not by Yahuah, and certainly not by Scripture, which presents Herod as an adversary of the Kingdom from beginning to end. Citing Herod’s household as evidence for righteous polygyny is like citing Nebuchadnezzar’s empire as evidence that Yahuah approves of conquest.

Justin Martyr:

The pro-polygyny position quotes Justin Martyr as acknowledging that Hebraic men of his day practiced polygyny. What they don’t mention is the full context: Justin Martyr was writing to rebuke and refute this practice. He was not endorsing it — he was pointing to it as evidence of departure from Yahuah’s original design, and calling those men to repentance. Justin Martyr’s witness is against polygyny, not for it. He is testifying for the other side.

Rabbi Gershom and the Year 1000 Ban:

The fact that something required a formal ban tells you it had already become problematic enough that rabbinic leadership felt compelled to act. Bans are responses to existing harm — not to things that were working beautifully. Among Sephardic Hebraic communities (far from Roman or Christian influence), the practice had largely faded long before any formal ruling — not because of external pressure, but because of the plain wisdom of living Yahuah’s original design.

Bottom Line on the Historical Witnesses:

Herod’s polygyny is documented — and Herod was a murderous tyrant, not a model of righteousness. Justin Martyr acknowledged polygyny existed in his day while actively opposing it. The Rabbenu Gershom ban reflects a return toward Yahuah’s design, not a departure from it. History confirms what Scripture teaches: polygyny was a human accommodation, never a divine ideal.

↑ Back to Claims List

With 22 common polygyny claims now examined and answered from Scripture, history, and linguistics, the case for polygyny does not hold up under honest scrutiny. But the case against it doesn’t end there. We now turn to two additional witnesses: the laws of the land — which we are called to honor unless they require us to break Torah — and the documented consequences that polygyny produces in the lives of real men, women, and children who have lived it.

Beyond the scriptural arguments, there’s a practical reality that proponents of polygyny often ignore:

Polygyny is illegal in the United States and most Western nations.

United States Law

Federal law:

  • The Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act (1862)
  • The Edmunds Act (1882)
  • The Edmunds-Tucker Act (1887)

State laws: All 50 states have bigamy laws making it illegal to be married to more than one person simultaneously.

Criminal penalties depending on the state can include felony charges, 2-5 years imprisonment, fines up to $10,000, and in some cases loss of parental rights.

Romans 13:1 — Submitting to Governing Authorities

“Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of Elohim: the powers that be are ordained of Elohim.”
— Romans 13:1

Since polygyny was never commanded — only regulated when it occurred — there is no biblical mandate to break the law over it.

For a deeper study on what Scripture says about obeying the laws of the land, we recommend this teaching: Do We Respect & Obey Courts & Government Authorities.

What the Research Shows: Modern Evidence Confirms Scripture’s Wisdom

Beyond biblical and legal arguments, documented research confirms what Scripture has shown for millennia: polygyny causes measurable harm to women, children, and the men who practice it.

Impact on Women

Al-Krenawi et al. (2011) — Systematic Review:

Women in polygynous marriages compared to monogamous marriages show significantly higher rates of depression and anxiety disorders, low self-esteem, hostility and anger, marital dissatisfaction, and psychosomatic symptoms.

Shepard (2013) — Psychological Study:

Women in polygynous unions report feelings of betrayal and abandonment, constant competition for the husband’s time and affection, lack of emotional intimacy, and increased stress and trauma.

“You’re always wondering if he’s thinking about her when he’s with you. You can never fully trust or rest. It’s emotional torture.”
— Research participant

Impact on Children

Bahari et al. (2021) — Meta-Analysis:

Children raised in polygynous families compared to monogamous families exhibit more behavioral problems, lower academic achievement, greater emotional distress and anxiety, higher rates of depression in adolescence, and difficulty forming healthy attachments.

The Neurobiological Reality

Human pair-bonding research (Fisher, 2004; Acevedo & Aron, 2009):

Humans are neurologically wired for pair-bonding through oxytocin and vasopressin. Deep emotional attachment activates the same brain regions as addiction. Splitting that attachment creates cognitive dissonance and emotional trauma.

Yahuah designed our brains and hearts for one-flesh unity. Polygyny fights against our very biology.

Part Four
Walking It Out — Guidance, Scripts & Practical Help

For Singles: Know Before You Commit

If you’re unmarried and seeking a spouse in Torah communities, ask these questions BEFORE engagement:

Essential Pre-Marriage Questions:

1. “Do you believe a man can biblically have more than one wife?”

Listen carefully to his answer. If he says yes or “maybe,” probe deeper.

2. “If you believed Yahuah was ‘calling’ you to take another wife, would you do it?”

This reveals whether he’d prioritize his interpretation over your covenant.

3. “What do you believe Genesis 2:24 and Matthew 19:4-6 teach about marriage?”

His interpretation will show his foundational beliefs.

4. “Have you been taught or influenced by teachers who promote polygyny?”

If yes, ask which teachers and what content.

Watch His Media Consumption

Pay attention to YouTube channels he follows, teachers he quotes, and online communities he participates in. How does he respond when polygyny is mentioned?

Trust Your Discernment

“Trust in Yahuah with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.”
— Proverbs 3:5-6

It’s better to remain single than to enter a covenant with someone who might later claim “freedom” to violate that covenant.

For Sisters Facing Polygyny in Their Marriage or Community

If you’ve wrestled with this topic and felt distant from Yahuah, or if this teaching has entered your marriage or community, please hear this:

Truth #1

Yahuah’s Character Does Not Change

“For I am Yahuah, I change not.”
— Malachi 3:6

The same Yahuah who designed one man and one woman in Eden is the same Yahuah you serve today. The confusion doesn’t come from Him.

If this teaching brings anxiety, division, and heartbreak — it’s not from Yahuah.

Truth #2

Your Feelings Are Valid

If the idea of sharing your husband causes you deep emotional pain, feelings of betrayal or inadequacy, distance from Yahuah, or marital conflict —

These are not signs of weak faith. They are evidence of the design Yahuah placed in your heart.

You were created for one-flesh covenant unity. Your resistance to polygyny is healthy and biblical.

Truth #3

You Are Not Required to Accept This

No teacher, husband, or leader has the authority to override Scripture.

If anyone tells you:

  • “If you truly trusted Yahuah, you’d be open to this”
  • “Your resistance is rebellion against Torah”
  • “Yahuah is calling our family to plural marriage”
  • “Real set-apart women submit to this”

These are manipulation tactics, not biblical truth.

Truth #4

Yahusha Raised the Standard, Not Lowered It

“From the beginning it was not so.”
— Matthew 19:8

Yahusha consistently pointed people back to Yahuah’s original, highest design — not to cultural compromises. Why would He lower the standard on marriage?

What If My Husband Believes This? Practical Guidance

This is one of the most heartbreaking questions we receive. Here’s counsel:

Step 1: Have an Honest, Scripture-Based Conversation

Prepare your heart first:

  • Pray for wisdom and peace (James 1:5)
  • Study the Scriptures in this article
  • Write down your concerns

During the conversation:

  • Express your feelings without accusation
  • Ask him to show you Scripture that commands polygyny (he won’t find it)
  • Walk through the passages in this article together
  • Ask: “Do you see the pain in every polygynous household in Scripture?”

Step 2: Seek Righteous Counsel

“Where there is no counsel, the people fall; But in the greatness of counsellors there is safety.”
— Proverbs 11:14

  • Talk to trusted elders in your assembly (if they hold biblical views on marriage)
  • Seek a biblical counselor experienced in Hebrew roots communities
  • Connect with older, wise sisters who can mentor you

Step 3: Set Clear Boundaries

You have the right to say:

“I entered this covenant as a one-flesh union. That’s what I vowed before Yahuah. I cannot and will not agree to polygyny. If you pursue this, you are breaking our covenant, not me.”

This is not rebellion. This is standing on Scripture.

Step 4: Protect Yourself If Necessary

If your husband continues to pressure you, uses spiritual manipulation, threatens to take another wife regardless of your feelings, or is already pursuing other women—this is a serious breach of covenant. You may need to involve your assembly’s elders, seek legal counsel, or consider temporary separation to protect your emotional and spiritual health.

Malachi 2:16 tells us that while Yahuah hates divorce, He also hates treachery. A husband pursuing polygyny against his wife’s will is dealing treacherously.

Step 5: Remember—This Is His Issue, Not Yours

  • You are not inadequate
  • You are not “less spiritual”
  • You are not failing him
  • He is failing to cherish you as Messiah cherishes the assembly (Ephesians 5:25)

How to Respond: Practical Scripts

Sometimes we know the truth in our hearts, but in the moment, the words don’t come. Here are practical responses you can use when confronted with polygyny teaching or pressure.

Before You Respond: Remember These Truths

  • You don’t owe anyone an elaborate theological defense. “No” is a complete sentence.
  • You’re not being rebellious. You’re standing on Scripture.
  • You don’t have to be nice to manipulators. Firm boundaries are biblical (Ephesians 5:11).
  • Your safety comes first. If a situation feels dangerous, remove yourself immediately.

When someone says: “Torah allows multiple wives. It’s biblical.”

You can respond:

“Torah regulated many things that weren’t Yahuah’s ideal design—including slavery and divorce. Just because something is regulated doesn’t mean it’s endorsed. Genesis 2:24 establishes Yahuah’s design: one man, one woman, one flesh. Yahusha confirmed this in Matthew 19:4-6 when He said ‘from the beginning it was not so.’ That’s the standard I’m holding to.”

If they persist: “Show me where polygyny is commanded in Scripture. I’ll wait.”

When someone says: “Abraham, Jacob, and David had multiple wives. Are you saying they were wrong?”

You can respond:

“Actually, every one of those households was marked by pain, not peace. Sarah and Hagar fought. Rachel and Leah competed for Jacob’s affection and their sons sold Joseph into slavery. David’s household descended into rape, murder, and civil war. The Bible records these things to show us the consequences of departing from Yahuah’s design—not to establish them as patterns to follow. Isaac had one wife and his household had the most peace. That tells me something.”

Follow-up: “Can you show me even one polygynous household in Scripture that was peaceful and thriving? Just one.”

When someone says: “You’re just influenced by Western feminism. You need to submit to Torah.”

You can respond:

“I am submitting to Torah—the Torah that says in Deuteronomy 17:17 that kings shall NOT multiply wives to themselves. The Torah that Yahusha interpreted in Matthew 19, pointing back to the Genesis design of one man and one woman. Rejecting polygyny isn’t Western feminism—it’s honoring Yahuah’s original design before cultural compromises crept in.”

Firm boundary: “Please don’t dismiss my biblical convictions as cultural conditioning. That’s condescending and avoids addressing what Scripture actually teaches.”

When someone says: “Yahuah told me you’re supposed to be my wife” (and he’s already married)

You can respond:

“I appreciate you sharing what you believe you heard, but Yahuah speaks to me about my own covenant. I haven’t received that confirmation, and I believe covenant requires mutual agreement—not one person claiming revelation for another. I’m not interested in pursuing this, and I need you to respect that boundary. Please don’t contact me about this again.”

Then: Actually inform the elders or trusted leadership. This is predatory behavior.

When your husband says: “I’m thinking about taking another wife. Yahuah has been putting it on my heart.”

You can respond:

“When we married, we entered a covenant as one flesh. That’s what we vowed before Yahuah. I didn’t agree to share you with another woman, and I won’t. If you pursue this, you’re violating our covenant—not me. Before this goes any further, we need to meet with a biblical counselor or our elders. This isn’t just between you and Yahuah—it affects me, our marriage, and our family. I’m asking you to hit pause on this and seek wise counsel with me.”

Then: Immediately contact trusted elders, a biblical counselor, and safe friends. Document everything. You may need a safety plan.

When someone says: “First Timothy 3:2 says ‘husband of one wife’ means husband of a FIRST wife. The Greek word ‘mias’ means first.”

You can respond:

“That’s incorrect. The Greek word for ‘first’ is ‘protos’—Paul uses it all throughout the New Testament when he means first. In 1 Timothy 3:2, Paul used ‘mias’—which means ‘one.’ Every major Greek lexicon confirms this: Thayer’s, BDAG, Strong’s—all define ‘mias’ as ‘one,’ not ‘first.’ Paul repeated this exact same phrase in 1 Timothy 3:12 for deacons and in Titus 1:6 for elders. The claim that ‘mias’ means ‘first’ is linguistic fabrication designed to justify what Scripture prohibits.”

If they double down: “Which Greek lexicon are you using? I’d like to see where you’re getting this translation from, because every standard reference work contradicts your claim.”

When someone says: “If you really trusted Yahuah, you’d be open to His will—even if it includes your husband taking another wife.”

You can respond:

“Trusting Yahuah doesn’t mean accepting every claim someone makes about His will. Yahuah’s will is revealed in His Word, and His Word is clear: ‘from the beginning it was not so’ (Matthew 19:8). My trust in Yahuah is exactly why I’m standing firm on His revealed design for marriage. Please don’t spiritually manipulate me by questioning my faith because I won’t accept a teaching that contradicts Scripture.”

Firm boundary: “This conversation is over. My convictions are between me and Yahuah, and I don’t owe you an explanation beyond what I’ve already given.”

When someone says: “The Bible defines adultery as a man sleeping with another man’s wife — so a married man sleeping with an unmarried woman isn’t adultery. He’s just adding a wife.”

You can respond:

“Yahusha addressed that exact argument in Matthew 5:27-28. He took the legal floor — ‘don’t sleep with a married woman’ — and raised the standard so high that even looking with lust is adultery in the heart. He was raising the bar, not creating loopholes. And the New Covenant forbids all porneia — sexual immorality of every kind — not just the specific acts that fell under Mosaic civil penalties. What you’re describing is a license for men to do whatever they want with any unmarried woman. That is not Torah. That is predatory behavior dressed in Hebrew vocabulary.”

Follow up: “If that logic is correct, a married man visiting a prostitute isn’t committing adultery either. Do you really believe Yahuah is okay with that?”

When someone says: “People who say polygyny is wrong are fulfilling the prophecy in 1 Timothy 4 about forbidding to marry. You’re teaching a doctrine of demons.”

You can respond:

“Paul was rebuking ascetics — people who said marriage itself was spiritually corrupt and believers should avoid it entirely. He was not rebuking people who uphold Yahuah’s original design for covenant marriage. Those are opposite positions. And notice: Paul wrote ‘husband of one wife’ three times in the same era he wrote that passage. If upholding monogamy is a doctrine of demons, then Paul condemned himself. I won’t accept a manipulation tactic that takes a warning against celibate asceticism and twists it to silence women defending their covenant.”

When someone says: “The Greek word idios in 1 Corinthians 7:2 means ‘shared’ — proving a husband doesn’t have to be exclusive to his wife the way she is to him.”

You can respond:

“That’s not what idios means. It means ‘one’s own, private, belonging to oneself’ — the exact opposite of shared. It’s used for ‘his own sheep,’ ‘his own Son,’ ‘his own body’ throughout the New Testament. And in the very same passage, verse 4, Paul says the husband does not have authority over his own body — his wife does. That’s mutual exclusivity. If polygyny were permitted, that verse would be incoherent. I’d ask which Greek lexicon you’re using for that definition, because every standard reference — Thayer’s, BDAG, Strong’s — contradicts it.”

Final Reminders When Using These Scripts:

  • You don’t have to JADE (Justify, Argue, Defend, Explain). State your position once clearly, then enforce boundaries.
  • Practice saying these out loud before you need them. Muscle memory helps when you’re under pressure.
  • You’re allowed to walk away from conversations that become manipulative or abusive.
  • Document interactions if they involve threats, coercion, or persistent harassment.
  • Your safety matters more than winning an argument. If you feel unsafe, remove yourself immediately.

Proverbs 26:4 says: “Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.” Sometimes the wisest response is to not engage at all. Trust your discernment.

For Brothers Reading This: A Call to Righteous Manhood

If you’re a man who has considered or taught polygyny, please hear this with an open heart:

The Standard Is Higher for Leaders

“My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.”
— James 3:1

Ask Yourself Honestly:

  1. Am I fully cherishing and serving the wife I have? (Ephesians 5:25-33)
  2. Is this teaching driven by biblical conviction or personal desire?
  3. Would I want this teaching applied to my daughter’s marriage?
  4. Can I point to thriving, peaceful polygynous households as proof it works?
  5. Have I truly studied what Yahusha taught about marriage from the beginning?

True biblical manhood:

  • Protects his wife’s heart
  • Prioritizes her flourishing
  • Lays down his desires for her wellbeing
  • Leads by serving, not demanding

If Messiah laid down His life for the assembly, how much more should you lay down your desires for your wife?

Frequently Asked Questions

Practical answers to real questions we receive from women in Torah communities.

Q: What if my community/assembly teaches that polygyny is acceptable?

First, verify what they actually teach: Are they saying it’s permissible, or are they actively promoting it? There’s a difference between “Torah doesn’t explicitly forbid it” (incorrect, but passive) and “Men should take multiple wives” (actively harmful).

Then, seek clarity from leadership:

  • Ask elders to show you Scripture that commands polygyny (not just tolerates it)
  • Request they address Matthew 19:4-6 and 1 Timothy 3:2

You are not rebellious for leaving a fellowship that teaches contrary to Scripture.

Q: What if I’m already in a polygynous situation?

This is one of the most complex situations a woman can find herself in, and it genuinely requires personalized, Spirit-led counsel — not a one-size-fits-all answer from an article. The right path forward depends on too many variables: whether you are wife #1 or a subsequent wife, whether children are involved, the condition of the covenant, and what Yahuah is speaking to you personally.

What we can say clearly: healing is possible, wholeness is Yahuah’s will for you, and you do not have to navigate this alone. Please visit our Resources tab for counseling support, or reach out to us directly through the contact form.

Q: I feel guilty for rejecting this teaching. What if I’m wrong and I’m rebelling against Torah?

Sister, that guilt is not from Yahuah.

The burden of proof is on those claiming polygyny is acceptable. Genesis 2:24, Matthew 19:4-6, 1 Timothy 3:2, and Deuteronomy 17:17 all point in one clear direction. Ask yourself: Does this teaching bring peace or anxiety? Yahuah is not the author of confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33).

Your resistance to polygyny is evidence of the Holy Spirit protecting your heart, not evidence of rebellion.

Q: A man approached me saying Yahuah told him I’m supposed to be his wife (and he’s already married). How do I respond?

You respond with a firm, clear “No” and remove yourself from his presence.

“I appreciate you sharing what you believe Yahuah told you, but I haven’t received that confirmation. If this were truly from Yahuah, He would speak to me directly about my own covenant. I’m not interested in pursuing this, and I ask that you respect my decision.”

If he persists, inform your assembly’s leadership about his behavior. This is spiritual manipulation — not divine direction.

Q: How do I know if a potential spouse secretly believes in polygyny?

Ask direct questions BEFORE engagement and don’t accept vague answers.

Ask him: “Do you believe a man can biblically have more than one wife?” “If you believed Yahuah was ‘calling’ you to take another wife after we’re married, what would you do?” “What do you believe Genesis 2:24 and Matthew 19:4-6 teach about marriage?”

Red flags: defensive or evasive answers, saying “we’ll discuss this after we’re married,” or frequently quoting polygyny-promoting teachers.

Don’t ignore warning signs hoping they’ll change after marriage.

Q: Can a marriage survive if my husband starts believing in polygyny after we’re already married?

It depends on several factors, but the short answer is: it’s very difficult, and you need immediate intervention.

Yes — if he’s willing to study Scripture honestly, submits to wise counsel, and repents.

No — if he refuses accountability, is actively pursuing other women, or uses spiritual manipulation.

Remember: HE is the one violating the covenant by pursuing polygyny. You’re not the problem — you’re standing on Scripture.

Q: Where can I find support from other women who’ve dealt with this issue?

You’re not alone, and you don’t have to navigate this by yourself.

Resources for support:

  • Set Apart Sisters community — Connect with other Torah-observant women who hold biblical marriage views
  • Biblical counselors — Seek counselors experienced in Hebrew roots communities
  • Trusted mentors — Older, wise women who can walk alongside you

Remember Hebrews 10:24-25: “Let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together.”

You need community. Reach out. Don’t suffer in isolation.

Q: What if a sister-wife sounds appealing to me — not because my husband wants it, but because I’m exhausted and could use the help with cooking, cleaning, the children & more!

Sister, you are not alone — and your exhaustion is real. Many women in Torah communities carry an enormous load: homeschooling, cooking from scratch, keeping Shabbat, preparing for the feasts, raising children, supporting their husband’s ministry, and still trying to show up as a wife. It makes sense that the idea of another set of hands sounds like relief.

But here’s what’s important to name: what you’re describing is not a desire for polygyny. It’s a desire for help, community, and rest — and those are legitimate, Yahuah-given needs. The solution to an overwhelmed wife is not another wife. It’s a husband who leads sacrificially, a community that shows up, and practical support systems.

Sarah thought the same thing. She was desperate for a solution and offered Hagar. It seemed practical. It seemed generous, even. And it produced jealousy, pain, rejection, and generational conflict that we’re still reading about today.

What you need is not a co-wife — you need:

  • A husband who is actively sharing the load (Ephesians 5:25-28)
  • A community of sisters who come alongside you (Titus 2:3-5)
  • Honest conversations about sustainability in your home
  • Rest — which Yahuah commands, not just permits (Exodus 20:8-11)

The Ezer (man’s helpmate) was not designed to carry everything alone. If you’re at that point of exhaustion, that’s not a sign you need another wife in your home — it’s a sign something in your current structure needs attention. Please reach out through our contact form or visit the Resources tab. You don’t have to figure this out alone.

Conclusion: Returning to Eden’s Blueprint

We’ve journeyed through Scripture, history, linguistics, research, and practical application. Let’s return to where we started—the beginning.

“And Yahuah Elohim said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him… And the rib, which Yahuah Elohim had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”
— Genesis 2:18, 22-24

The Pattern Is Clear:

  • One man — Adam
  • One woman — Eve, made FROM him
  • One flesh — complete unity

This was before the fall, before sin, before cultural compromise. This was Yahuah’s perfect will—and it still is.

The Consequences Speak:

Every polygynous household in Scripture was marked by jealousy, rivalry, favoritism, rape, murder, rebellion, and idolatry.

Show me one peaceful, thriving polygynous family in all of Scripture. You cannot.

What Yahusha Taught:

“Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, and said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore Elohim hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”
— Matthew 19:4-6

Yahuah joined ONE man to ONE woman. Let no teaching, no teacher, no tradition put that asunder.

The Verdict:

Polygyny is not:

  • Yahuah’s original design
  • Commanded in Torah
  • Practiced by Isaac (the only patriarch who chose his marriage)
  • Endorsed by regulation verses
  • Supported by Greek linguistics
  • Permitted for congregation leaders
  • Legal in most nations
  • Healthy for women or children
  • Blessed with peace in any biblical example

Monogamous covenant marriage is:

  • Yahuah’s original design (Genesis 2:24)
  • Reaffirmed by Yahusha (Matthew 19:4-6)
  • Required for elders (1 Timothy 3:2, Titus 1:6)
  • Commanded for kings (Deuteronomy 17:17)
  • Modeled by Isaac
  • Supported by the one-flesh principle
  • Protective of women’s hearts
  • Healthy for children
  • Reflective of Messiah and His assembly (Ephesians 5:25-32)

Final Word: Peace Through Truth

Sister, if this teaching has troubled you, may these truths bring peace to your heart:

Yahuah’s design for marriage is beautiful, protective, and good.

You are not less spiritual for rejecting polygyny. You are not rebelling against Torah. You are not imposing Western values. You are not failing to trust Yahuah.

You are standing on His Word, His design, and His perfect will from the beginning.

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
— John 8:32

One man. One woman. One covenant. One flesh.

That was Yahuah’s perfect will from the very beginning—and it still is today.

📖 Further Reading on Related Topics

You may also find these resources helpful:

  • Unequally Yoked: What’s the Harm? by Sister Lucia — an excellent exploration of what it means to be truly equally yoked, and why it matters before you commit.
  • Waiting on Yah for Your Mate — a Set Apart Sisters article coming soon on trusting Yahuah’s timing in your season of singleness.
  • Marriage, Divorce & Remarriage — an upcoming teaching series that will address what Scripture actually says about these often misunderstood topics.

Resources for Further Study

Recommended Scripture Study Plan:

Week 1: Yahuah’s Original Design

  • Genesis 1-2 (Creation and marriage)
  • Matthew 19:3-12 (Yahusha on marriage)
  • Ephesians 5:22-33 (Messiah and the assembly)

Week 2: Polygyny’s Consequences

  • Genesis 16, 21 (Sarah and Hagar)
  • Genesis 29-30 (Rachel and Leah)
  • 2 Samuel 11-13 (David’s household)
  • 1 Kings 11 (Solomon’s downfall)

Week 3: Torah’s Teachings

  • Deuteronomy 17:14-20 (Kings and wives)
  • Exodus 21:1-11 (Regulations vs. endorsements)
  • Malachi 2:13-16 (Yahuah hates treachery)

Week 4: New Testament Affirmation

  • 1 Timothy 3:1-7 (Elder qualifications)
  • Titus 1:5-9 (Elder qualifications)
  • 1 Corinthians 7 (Marriage counsel)
  • Hebrews 13:4 (Honor marriage)

Primary Scriptural Sources

Masoretic Text (MT) — The Hebrew text underlying the Old Testament/Tanakh, used for all Hebrew word studies and lexical references in this article.

Septuagint (LXX) — The ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew scriptures, consulted for cross-referencing key terms and confirming translational consistency.

The Scriptures 2009 (TS2009) — Institute for Scripture Research. Primary translation used throughout this article unless otherwise noted.

HalleluYah Scriptures — Consulted for cross-referencing key passages using the restored Names.

King James Version (KJV) — Used for select passages and for accessibility to broader audiences.

Extra-Biblical Sources

Damascus Document (CD 4:20–5:2) — Dead Sea Scrolls. A foundational text of the Qumran community (approx. 1st–2nd century BCE), condemning polygyny as one of the three nets of Belial and appealing to Genesis 1:27 and 7:9 as the basis for monogamy. Accessed via the Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library and standard academic translations.

Lexical & Language References

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance — James Strong (1890). Used for Hebrew and Greek word definitions, including H259 (echad), H7686 (shagah), H8130 (sane), G2398 (idios), G3391 (mias), and G4413 (protos).

Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible — Jeff A. Benner. Used for root-meaning analysis of Hebrew terms throughout the article.

The Expanded Greek New Testament — Consulted for fuller contextual meaning of key New Testament passages, including 1 Timothy 3:2 and Titus 1:6.

Thayer’s Greek Lexicon — Joseph Henry Thayer. Used to confirm the definition of mias (G3391) as “one,” not “first,” and idios (G2398) as “one’s own, private, belonging to oneself.”

BDAG — Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich Greek Lexicon — Used to further confirm the definitions of mias as “one, only one” and idios as “pertaining to oneself, one’s own.”

Teaching Contribution

Sister Joyful Song (2023). “Polygamy Polyandry: An Investigative Look and an In-Depth Conversation, Part 1.” PowerPoint presentation prepared for an episode on this topic for Kingdom Relationships, the podcast she co-hosts on the Yahudah Living YouTube channel. Her research and presentation notes on the biblical timeline of polygyny, the patriarchal narratives, and covenant theology were instrumental in shaping key sections of this article. Her contribution reflects years of diligent scriptural study and a compassionate heart for women in Torah communities.

Additional Resources

Kitchen, K. A. (2003). On the Reliability of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, pp. 93–96.

de Vaux, Roland. (1961). Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 30–32.

Dr. Huldah Dauid (guest). (2021). “Polygamy/Polygyny from HER Perspective — Episode 26.” What She Said Podcast, July 29, 2021.

119 Ministries. (n.d.). “Answering Atheists: Does the Bible Endorse Polygamy?” Test Everything. Retrieved from youtu.be/ah_qtT7vAr0. Includes citation of Dr. Richard Davidson on monogamy and monotheism.

Al-Krenawi, A., Graham, J. R., & Slonim-Nevo, V. (2011). “Mental health aspects of Arab-Israeli adolescents from polygamous versus monogamous families.” Journal of Social Psychology, 142(4), 446-460.

Bahari, M. A., et al. (2021). “A systematic review of the impacts of polygamy on women and children: Mental health and family outcomes.” International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(3), 245-256.

Shepard, L. D. (2013). “The impact of polygamy on women’s mental health: A systematic review.” Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 22(1), 47-62.

All Scripture quotations from The Scriptures 2009 (TS2009) unless otherwise noted.

Recent Views: 1,622

Please Like, Share & Comment Below!

7 Likes

WHAT'S ON YOUR MIND?

You're invited to share your thoughts, questions, or words of encouragements to the author below.

6 thoughts on “What the Bible Really Says About Multiple Wives”

  1. Sister Diane

    No thoughts or questions, but the words are these: This is one of the most complete compilations on polygamy I have come across. The presentation Sister Nicole and Sister June put together answers all the major questions and concerns on the subject. It is easily understood; a plus, and well written. This article has strong biblically supportive evidence, with additional external sources that serve to strengthen the message that Yahuah did not sanction polygamy. Academic in nature but easy to read, this article includes page numbers to easily locate statements and quotations. Print it out to include it alongside your own readings.
    Well done, Sister June and Sister Nicole
    Your Fellow Servant in Yah
    Sister Diane

    Reply
    1. Sister June

      Sister Diane, thank you so much for taking the time to read and share such thoughtful words. Your encouragement truly means a lot. I’m especially grateful that you found the article both thorough and easy to follow—that was very much our heart in putting it together. It was approached with prayer and care, and your feedback is deeply encouraging. All esteem to Yahuah.

      Reply
  2. April A Jolly

    Dear Sister June and Sister Nicole,

    Sister Diane encapsulated my own thoughts about this heavily documented and important topic. There is literally not one stone left unturned in putting forth Yah’s mind on this subject of polygamy-a practice that I had no idea until reading this is under so much serious consideration in our modern times. Praise Yah for the wisdom shared here and in such a forthright but loving way.

    Reply
    1. Sister June

      Shalom Sister April, thanks so much for reading & your kind words here – they mean a lot. I’m grateful to Yah that the article brought clarity, especially on something that many don’t realize is even being discussed today. That was truly our heart in sharing this info.
      And I appreciate you noting the balance, as we strove to achieve balance. It was a long one but hoping all the info in one place is more helpful than breaking it up among multiple articles(series) 🙏🏽. All esteem to Yahuah!

      Reply
  3. Sister Nicole (Joyful Song)

    This was a very well thought out and executed presentation. Sister June deserves the credit, as she put in the work for this much needed article. This is a breath of fresh air to the the Torah Community. My prayer is that this message will spread far and wide. May sisters understand how Abba sees them and how precious they truly are in His sight. May brothers who are deceived, wake up. Very well done, Sister June. I know it’s been a long time coming. Awesome job! Praise Abba!!! Thank you for this.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Click Here for Articles by June

More Encouragement for Your Journey

Healing, Torah

Matthew Pens Yahusha’s Non-Israelite Relatives

Contributed by Sister June

Who exactly is considered Yashrael or Yah’s chosen?
Relationships, Testimony

Yahusha Had to Transform My Heart First

Contributed by Sister BritYah

How Yahusha Restored My Identity as a Daughter of Zion
Devotional

Modesty: Scripture’s Perspective

Contributed by Sister Erica

True adornment begins within. What Yah's Word says on modesty & more.
Share via
Facebook
X (Twitter)
LinkedIn
Mix
Pinterest
Bluesky
Tumblr
Skype
Buffer
Pocket
VKontakte
Parler
Xing
Reddit
Line
Flipboard
MySpace
Delicious
Amazon
Digg
Evernote
Blogger
LiveJournal
Baidu
MeWe
NewsVine
Yummly
Yahoo
WhatsApp
Viber
SMS
Telegram
Facebook Messenger
Like
Email
Print
Copy Link
Copy link
CopyCopied
SUBSCRIBE? YES NO